Plot-wise, Batman Forever is fairly linear and doesn’t harbor many surprises, but I actually didn’t mind that too much. Instead, it feels like a love letter to the 1960s Adam West TV series infused with ’90s touches. For me, Batman Forever was never meant to fall into that vein. Thus, I don’t think a movie like Batman Forever could be made today as exposure to darker, starker treatments have seemingly changed the public’s perception of the Dark Knight.

Modern treatments tend to (but not always) either favor cold, stark realism or bloody, profanity-laced R-rated fare. Seemingly gone are the days when superheroes were allowed to be colorful, comical, and corny. I sense some of this inherent dislike stems from a change in cultural attitudes about superheroes. It’s not the best Batman film by any means nor is it a great film overall, but it’s also not the worst movie ever made nor does it do a complete disservice to Batman and his rogue’s gallery.

But can Batman and Robin stop Two Face and the Riddler before it’s too late, or is Gotham doomed to fall right into their nefarious clutches?Īllow me to go ahead and clear the air – is Batman Forever as bad as its reputation over the years has made it out to be? In the end, Batman must face two formidable foes but he’s not without help, which arrives in the form of former circus performer Dick Grayson/Robin (Chris O’Donnell). However, Two Face isn’t the only villain in town as a disgraced Wayne Enterprises employee, Ed Nygma (Jim Carrey), assumes a new identity as the Riddler, and he will stop at nothing to control the minds of Gotham’s citizens. In the meantime, Bruce privately struggles with reoccurring nightmares of his parents’ deaths, which causes him to seek the psychological assistance of the seductive Dr. Here, Batman/Bruce Wayne (Val Kilmer) is forced to contend with the vengeful antics of former District Attorney-turned-neer-do-well Harvey Dent/Two Face (Tommy Lee Jones). Joel Schumacher) is the third adaptation of the Dark Knight preceded by Tim Burton’s Batman (1989) and Batman Returns (1992).

So is this neon-infused incarnation of Batman worth a second look, or is it a comic book movie better left in the ’90s?īatman Forever (dir. However, when comic book movies first came on the scene, they tended to be less serious and sober than they are now. It seems that modern takes on the Dark Knight lean more towards the brooding and the moody.

Batman forever movie chris o donnell